Craig Conroy for Jamie Lundmark and two picks is a great move for the Flames (that pains me to say). Conroy has a productive history on that team obviously and has three times as many points as Lundmark. (An aside: I remember when Lundmark was a first round prodigy and untouchable for the Rangers a few years ago. Then again, they said the same thing about Manny Malhotra so, yeah, go Rangers).
The Brad Stuart move is a bit more perplexing, at least from
My issue here is that, so far, the Canucks have been able to beat
As February 27th looms, Nonis has a decision to make much like Sutter: do you move players/picks to gamble that you can do some damage this spring and ride Luongo as far as he can take you or do you stay idle, be happy you didn't end up in last place in the league as all the pundits predicted and focus your "retooling" efforts on next year? Nonis doesn’t really have an expendable Ference or Lundmark to move and no GM in their right mind is going to bang his door down for Bulis or Chouinard (damnit, where’s Keenan when you need him?). Would he move a prospect like Grabner or Schneider for a rental if you still get bumped out in the first round? And what about Naslund, the captain who only has a handful of years left to play and how he’s going to feel if Nonis keeps retooling?
Then again, perhaps I am making something out of nothing. The new Flames hardly brought the Joe to their knees with their play last night. But I remain, obviously, quite interested to see what Nonis will do. If nothing else, I pray one of the moves isn’t to pry Weinrich out of retirement; if I see that yellow visor in a Canuck uniform again, I’ll gladly flip this blog over to recap meaningless and mundane preseason baseball games.
4 comments:
I don't think Nonis will sacrifice our future for a Forsberg-type. But I could see him getting Gelinas still, or someone like him.
Some one we don't have to sacrifice alot for!
Besides, we have Reid and Moran playing with Nazzy now! Instant chemistry! Woo!
I think a more pertinent question could be what do we really need? An extra d-man never hurts, but everyone wants them. I hate to say it, but I would like Carter back. Now that the twins are leading the offensive charge and Vigneault is doing well at mixing lines, I would much rather have him on the ice at the expense of other guys.
I'm not terribly sold on pitching Bulis yet either...he's become extremely annoying in that I want to hate him but his play has become more well rounded so I really can't. Help me Zanstorm, help me hate him!
All in all, I still think Bulis is worth keeping. When he is given the oppurtunity to play his way, he usually gets a couple of points. Definitely more effective than the like os Chouinard, so it is strange than Nonis gave him the 2 year deal whilst only signing the likes of Pyatt and Bulis to one-year contracts
formerlynjjohan - I can forgive Nonis for Chouinard; somehow his numbers under Lemaire last year were far better then under Vigneault's system. Pyatt was a gamble and Bulis was an experiment. Sadly, just for salary cap purposes, Bulis and Salo are the best guys to move as rentals. It'll be interesting to see what he does, if anything.
Post a Comment