10.13.2006

Whales & Sharks

The boys finally get a home game and a chance to let the locals get a rink side view of Luongo and, well, the rest of them. Sadly it comes with a revoltingly strong San Jose Shark squad visiting GM Place, but they will be playing their third game in five nights whereas Vancouver has been off since losing to the Wild in a shootout Tuesday night.

What to watch for #1: Secondary scoring. The Sharks top line of Smith, Thornton and Cheechoo have the luxury of taking a night off since their second line of Marleau, Michalek and Bernier can get the job done. Vancouver can't say the same; outside of the Sedin/Naslund line (you're on crack if you think I'm calling that the Ikea line) the likes of Morrison, Pyatt, Bulis, Kesler, Cooke et all have not truly got going yet (unless you count untimely netural zone penalties). Could tonight be that night? Something tells me no, but let's pretend the home crowd gives someone an extra reason to get pissed and productive.

What to watch for #2: The battered D line. Sami Salo has subscribed to the long list of guys who get wonky groins early in the season, so he'll be sitting tonight. The thin blueline just got a bit thinner and now has no choice but to point rely very heavily on Kevin Bieksa and rookie Luc Bourdon. Insert your favorite curse word here (bonus points if you can couple in a family member in the process and create an entirely new curse phrase: "father fucker", "uncle shitface", "cousin shittybitchhead". It's fun for the whole family, honestly).

What to watch for #3: Goalies. Roberto Luongo is clearly the man after four games. He has yet to be beaten in those oh so fun clear and unobstructed ways that Dan Cloutier’s GAA seems to suggest he is still excelling at. However, the Sharks can counter with not just one #1 goalie but two in Toskala and Nabakov. The latter got torn apart by the Oilers last night though so assume Toskala will be in net.

Who’s going to win? The Sharks. I will admit this is partly due to the fact I’m still used to the Canucks letting me down and this season they seem to be correcting that reflex. However, even a tired Sharks team is a formidable opponent and the Canucks scoring thus far has relied on their top line, seizing on opportunities during line changes or defensive mistakes by the other team. Vancouver’s D will be busy all night (Bourdon? Are you familiar with the phrase “trial by fire”?) so it’s imperative the Luongo plays out of his mind again while the defensemen have no mental hiccups. Vancouver only wins this game if all four lines contribute…by which I mean at least two or three lines contribute far more then the vague “team effort” contribution and, rather, put some pucks in the net and get on the scoresheet. Assuming the team concept is still a work in progress, I’ll give the edge to the Sharks.

Need something to get angry at? The damn Vancouver newspapers. I recognize sports columnists and sports radio (I work in radio, trust me) beat minor issues to death because content is content. But, seriously, this whole trap thing discussion is boring me. Is this what passes for fine editorial copy: stating the obvious? Of course the Canucks are going to trap from time to time and far more frequently then they used to. So what? If it works, then shut up. If it doesn’t, they’ll figure something else out. But claiming it gives you (or rather the collective ‘we’) a poor product is piss poor reasoning and proof that some people, clearly, can’t accept change.

If you want a run and gun game and that’s it, then please by all means go cover the Kings. They have Crawford, they have Cloutier, they have young fast rookies & they’ll play that game all year long. From what I can see, they have a staggering three more goals then the so called boring Canucks. I also seem to every playoff bound team past the first round last year had some sort of defensive-minded system over a cherry picking Pavel Bure mentality. So accept the winds of change (that’s right, I invoked a Scorpions song. I hope the chorus gets stuck in your head and you start inadvertently singing it) and move on.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

[p]The type became known ready for its distinct style directed at the current trends in fashion and awareness of intricate information . Very easy to [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]tiffany bracelet uk sale[/url] make a difference that gift idea is best, Thomas Sabo Bracelets, what is important is usually that diamond jewelry Pandora will likely be specific and can usually be identified . The charms for Travel are well [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]tiffany bracelet uk
[/url] liked . Many individuals consider an ideal [url=http://www.saletiffanysetsonline.co.uk]tiffany heart pendant necklace
[/url] provides to purchase for their beloved . So instead of applying a massive rhinestone, guys now favor to invest in tiny, less within your face, but greater [url=http://www.saletiffanysetsonline.co.uk]tiffany outlet[/url] quality thomas sabo . Some individuals will possess a particular kind of jewelry that [url=http://www.saletiffanysetsonline.co.uk]tiffany heart pendant online[/url] they can be thinking about . The choices are almost brain-boggling!
These appeal bracelets are remarkably [url=http://www.cheapsilvertiffanyuk.co.uk]discount Tiffany Bracelet[/url] great top quality and will stand up to natural wear and tear fantastically.[/p]

[url=http://www.experienceproject.com/groups/Think-Glen-Beck-Is-A-Moron/241530]They sale cheap jewellery online 6d[/url]
[url=http://www.wageralarm.com/wa-blog/elite-eight-saturday/#PageComment_73449]They sale cheap handbags online 0k[/url]
[url=http://necropolis.deleted-scenes.com/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&f=3&p=52141]They sale cheap jewellery online 0m[/url]

Anonymous said...

[p]com . Allow other skincare products to penetrate more deeply . This is an indication that you must move to another area . Clarisonic Mia is compact, small and waterproof .   I could wear much less makeup foundation too . In addition [url=http://www.outletclarisonic.com]clarisonic mia[/url] to clean skin with the Clarisonic skin cleansing system, you'll notice a decrease in the appearance skin pores, wrinkles and fine lines removal, improved skin tone and help to easily absorption serums and moisturizers . Be sure to place the Suncamp . 每镁C l a r i s o n i c M i a , h o m e h i - t e c h w a s h e x p e r t

T h e C l a r i s o n i c M i a w a s h b r u s h a d v e n t c a n b e s a i d t h a t a r e v o l u t i o n o f w a s h , h a n d w a s h o u t d a t e d C l a r i s o n i c M i a " w a s h i n g m a c h i n e " i s n o t j u s t c o n v e n i e n t , p r o v i d e d s i x t i m e s c l e a n O h.[/p][p]The fine lines on my [url=http://www.outletclarisonic.com]clarisonic mia 2 sale[/url] forehead were less obvious, my pores looked cleaner and smaller, I was less prone to patches of random flakiness, and my general complexion was noticeably brighter . Then I think space uses, once or twice a week should be enough!

Well see beauty, I will make a detailed summary . The steam loosens [url=http://www.outletclarisonic.com]clarisonic mia outlet[/url] up skin cells, making the whole process infinitely less irritating and more effective . Several weeks later, though, my usually blemish-free cheeks started to get proper spotty . In circular movements , application of the brush head [url=http://www.outletclarisonic.com]clarisonic brush[/url] is required for 20 seconds each at the forehead, chin and nose and another 10 seconds on either cheeks . initial few days, the skin out of fuel do feel better, but in recent days do not know if the temperature is too high, the amount of oil is the addition of some the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles, currently do not see this function to use the period, and secondly, I am also lacks wrinkles . Who Should Use Clarisonic Brushes?
Any woman who cares enough [url=http://www.outletclarisonic.com]clarisonic mia 2[/url] for her skin should use Clarisonic products . Basically my face acne fast nonintact put up and it will not break.[/p]